|
167 Stoke Newington High Street
Tel: 020 7245 0681 Email us
from this link |
|

This page aims to highlight some background information regarding mental health issues and the use of the law in general and Bipolar Affective Disorder in particular by providing links to other sites and web-articles.
The Indeterminate Sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP)
The two points below are taken from the JUSTICE response to the Government Sentencing Green Paper: "Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders" (Read the full document as a PDF)
15. In relation to IPP/DPP, we believe that these sentences should not merely be restricted but should be abolished. They have proved unworkable in practice, are little understood by prisoners or the public and are likely to have an extremely damaging psychological effect upon many of those subject to them, which is both of concern in itself and an impediment to effective rehabilitation. We are particularly concerned that the criteria for 'dangerousness' make it more likely that such a sentence will be imposed if an offender is suffering from mental illness. Further, we especially oppose the use of detention for public protection for children and young people under 18, since to label a child as 'dangerous' at the start of a long sentence fails to take into account the child's development as they progress towards adulthood, and the psychological impact of an uncertain, potential life, sentence upon a child will be particularly grave. Life sentences (whether IPP/DPP or discretionary or mandatory 'life' sentences) should be reserved for a small number of the most serious adult offenders where both a very long period in prison is justified by the seriousness of the offence (on grounds of harm and culpability) and the lifelong licence period is justified by the ongoing risk to the public - as demonstrated by the offence for which the person is being sentenced and their offending history. Traditionally, this was recognised by the fact that only a small number of offences carried a potential life sentence and for most of these a life sentence would only be imposed for the most serious examples of these offences. In our view, this was the appropriate position. The 'dangerous offenders' provisions extended the possibility of life sentences into cases where they were being imposed to restrain potential future conduct without being required to reflect proven past conduct.
16. The CJA 2003's 'extended sentences' for 'dangerous offenders' (where the licence period is extended) are less damaging than IPP/DPP but our concerns about the dangerousness criteria still apply. If IPP/DPP are to be retained we welcome the indication that the release test may be reformed; the extremely low release rate for these prisoners demonstrates how difficult it is to demonstrate sufficient reduction of risk, particularly in circumstances where prisoners often do not have access to the appropriate courses.
Call for inquiry
after seventh teenager dies in custody
"IPP is a flawed policy with a flawed execution" - JUSTICE calls for fundamental reform of 'flawed' system of IPP sentencing (Read as a PDF)
A Chance for Better Jails - Frances Crook the Guardian 9 June 2011
Fatal
Consequences of Benefit changes - Letter to the Guardian 1 June 2011
"State
must keep Care not Custody promise" Letter to the Guardian 11 March
2011
www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk,
www.rethink.org, www.mencap.org.uk,
www.mind.org.uk
"Fears
grow over care of mentally ill as GP's say they don't want the job" Letter to the Guardian
18 July 2010
"Doctors
failing to identify bipolar disorder, says medicine watchdog" - Sarah
Hall, Health Correspondent, The
Guardian,
Andy Burnham: A
health plan fit for Daniel Hannan
What
is Bipolar Disorder?
Also see MDF The Bipolar Organisation
For more information email justiceforjoe@hotmail.co.uk
LINK
TO FACEBOOK
We have set up a campaigning page to highlight Joe's case on Facebook. Please visit, join and share with your friends.
Webmaster: Plan B Websites